BrandWiki Rating: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen

Aus BrandWiki
Wechseln zu:Navigation, Suche
imported>Ahoi
(Created page with "The rating follows a simple color coding: : 0 = red = missing, misleading, incorrect information. : 1 = yellow = some information there, good start, but still information miss...")
 
imported>Ahoi
 
(Eine dazwischenliegende Version desselben Benutzers wird nicht angezeigt)
Zeile 5: Zeile 5:
 
: 3 = supergreen = overly informative, proactive communication of more, leading example in aspects
 
: 3 = supergreen = overly informative, proactive communication of more, leading example in aspects
  
; Production transparency
+
We are looking for '''correct, credible, accessible, transparent information''', preferrably on the brand's and/or organisation's website.
 +
 
 +
; Production & CSR transparency – information there and verifiable?
 +
: 0 = no information about CSR activities
 +
: 1 =
 +
: 2 =
 +
: 3 = active, proactive information about CSR activities
  
 
; Ownership transparency
 
; Ownership transparency
Zeile 11: Zeile 17:
 
: 1 = imprint on the website, first information there
 
: 1 = imprint on the website, first information there
 
: 2 = imprint on the website, company shares transparent, further ownerships/stakeholders (also of the company, enterprise structures) clear correct
 
: 2 = imprint on the website, company shares transparent, further ownerships/stakeholders (also of the company, enterprise structures) clear correct
: 3 =clear structure of company/enterprise, proactive communication without marketing verschleierung, truthful inforation, overly
+
: 3 = clear structure of company/enterprise, proactive communication without marketing speech/disguise, truthful information
 +
 
 +
; CSR activities and transparency – information there and verifiable?
 +
: 0 = information about CSR activities missing, misleading or in suspicion of [[Greenwashing]].
 +
: 1 =
 +
 
 +
 
 +
<!--
 +
Transparency 0 – no information about brand values or production details
 +
Transparency 1 – (marketing) information about brand values and production details
 +
Transparency 2 – detailled information about production details and background
 +
Transparency 3 – very transparent, open, traceable information about production and retail details
 +
Transparency * – 
 +
; Credibility of information
 +
Credibility –1 – Infomration given is fake or seems to be lies.
 +
Credibility 0 – Information given cannot be established as credible or not, not traceable.
 +
Credibility 1 – 
 +
Credibility 2 – 
 +
Credibility 3 – Necessary information given is up to 100% traceable, credible (valuable sources).-->

Aktuelle Version vom 21. Mai 2019, 14:24 Uhr

The rating follows a simple color coding:

0 = red = missing, misleading, incorrect information.
1 = yellow = some information there, good start, but still information missing
2 = green = that's the level you want to reach as a brand/company: good, correct, accessible, transparent information
3 = supergreen = overly informative, proactive communication of more, leading example in aspects

We are looking for correct, credible, accessible, transparent information, preferrably on the brand's and/or organisation's website.

Production & CSR transparency – information there and verifiable?
0 = no information about CSR activities
1 =
2 =
3 = active, proactive information about CSR activities
Ownership transparency
0 = unclear who “owns” the brand, missing imprint OR misleading/incorrect information
1 = imprint on the website, first information there
2 = imprint on the website, company shares transparent, further ownerships/stakeholders (also of the company, enterprise structures) clear correct
3 = clear structure of company/enterprise, proactive communication without marketing speech/disguise, truthful information
CSR activities and transparency – information there and verifiable?
0 = information about CSR activities missing, misleading or in suspicion of Greenwashing.
1 =