BrandWiki:Warum nicht Wikipedia?: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen

Version vom 18. April 2019, 23:14 Uhr

If there already exists the largest encyclopaedia in the world – why would anybody need another wiki? We love Wikipedia! But let's see some ideas.

Wikipedia is a grown platform, in internet terms it's old (15 years). Over the years, it has grown quite an administrative apparatus. Editing on Wikipedia follows, wait:

It also has a disturbing image for rules! Among them, there are nice 10 simple rules, also an advice to ignore all rules. The article about how to write your first article takes about 22 minutes to read.

Wow! Here, you get 1 simple page with friendly guidelines and easy forms to fill out that won't need no introduction.

Monopolisation, in any aspect, is maybe not a good idea: It's killing competition and gives power over many to a few.

@@ Zeile 6: / Zeile 6: @@
 *[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Policies_and_guidelines policies and guidelines]
 *[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:List_of_guidelines a list of guidelines]
-*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:List_of_policies_and_guidelines a list of policies and guidelines]
+*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:List_of_policies_and_guidelines a list of policies and guidelines].
-*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:List_of_guidelines a list of guidelines].
 It also has a disturbing [https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:Wiki_rules.png image for rules]! Among them, there are nice [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Ten_simple_rules_for_editing_Wikipedia 10 simple rules], also an advice to [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Ignore_all_rules ignore all rules]. The article about [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Your_first_article how to write your first article] takes about 22 minutes to read.